analyticsData & Analytics
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CWAN: 3—MDB: 2wins
Rule of 40
69.4CWAN
39.7MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
Revenue Growth
62.7%CWAN
22.4%MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
Gross Margin
67%CWAN
72%MDB
check_circleMDB leads
FCF Margin
6.7%CWAN
17.3%MDB
check_circleMDB leads
Operating Margin
1.1%CWAN
-6.6%MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
NRR
—CWAN
—MDB
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CWAN
69.4check_circle
MDB
39.7
Revenue GrowthYoY
CWAN
62.7%check_circle
MDB
22.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CWAN
67%
MDB
72%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CWAN
6.7%
MDB
17.3%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
CWAN
1.1%check_circle
MDB
-6.6%
NRRNet retention
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
Market CapUSD
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus MongoDB, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. scores 69.4 compared to MongoDB, Inc.'s 39.7, placing Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. 67% vs MongoDB, Inc. 72%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Data & Analytics sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.