analyticsData & Analytics
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
CWAN: 4—MDB: 1wins
Rule of 40
84.3CWAN
43.1MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
Revenue Growth
61.9%CWAN
22.8%MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
Gross Margin
67%CWAN
72%MDB
check_circleMDB leads
FCF Margin
22.5%CWAN
20.3%MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
Operating Margin
-1.1%CWAN
-5.6%MDB
check_circleCWAN leads
NRR
—CWAN
—MDB
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CWAN
84.3check_circle
MDB
43.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CWAN
61.9%check_circle
MDB
22.8%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CWAN
67%
MDB
72%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CWAN
22.5%check_circle
MDB
20.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CWAN
-1.1%check_circle
MDB
-5.6%
NRRNet retention
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
Market CapUSD
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CWAN
N/A
MDB
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus MongoDB, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. scores 84.3 compared to MongoDB, Inc.'s 43.1, placing Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Clearwater Analytics Holdings, Inc. 67% vs MongoDB, Inc. 72%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Data & Analytics sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.