analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CVLT: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
38.9CVLT
-44.1DDD
check_circleCVLT leads
Revenue Growth
18.9%CVLT
-14.5%DDD
check_circleCVLT leads
Gross Margin
81%CVLT
35%DDD
check_circleCVLT leads
FCF Margin
20.0%CVLT
-29.6%DDD
check_circleCVLT leads
Operating Margin
6.3%CVLT
-21.3%DDD
check_circleCVLT leads
NRR
—CVLT
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CVLT
38.9check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CVLT
18.9%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CVLT
81%check_circle
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CVLT
20.0%check_circle
DDD
-29.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CVLT
6.3%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
CVLT
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CVLT
2.9x
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CVLT
$4.3B
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CVLT
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CVLT
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC trades at 2.9x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC scores 38.9 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC 81% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.