analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CSGS: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
-0.5CSGS
-44.1DDD
check_circleCSGS leads
Revenue Growth
1.4%CSGS
-14.5%DDD
check_circleCSGS leads
Gross Margin
49%CSGS
35%DDD
check_circleCSGS leads
FCF Margin
-1.9%CSGS
-29.6%DDD
check_circleCSGS leads
Operating Margin
10.3%CSGS
-21.3%DDD
check_circleCSGS leads
NRR
—CSGS
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CSGS
-0.5check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CSGS
1.4%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CSGS
49%check_circle
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CSGS
-1.9%check_circle
DDD
-29.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CSGS
10.3%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
CSGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CSGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CSGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CSGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CSGS
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC scores -0.5 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CSG SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL INC 49% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.