analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q2 2026
Summary Verdict
CRWD: 4—EGHT: 1wins
Rule of 40
51.6CRWD
10.3EGHT
check_circleCRWD leads
Revenue Growth
23.7%CRWD
2.0%EGHT
check_circleCRWD leads
Gross Margin
74%CRWD
66%EGHT
check_circleCRWD leads
FCF Margin
27.9%CRWD
8.3%EGHT
check_circleCRWD leads
Operating Margin
-6.9%CRWD
3.4%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
NRR
—CRWD
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CRWD
51.6check_circle
EGHT
10.3
Revenue GrowthYoY
CRWD
23.7%check_circle
EGHT
2.0%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CRWD
74%check_circle
EGHT
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CRWD
27.9%check_circle
EGHT
8.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CRWD
-6.9%
EGHT
3.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
CRWD
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CRWD
34.2x
EGHT
0.7xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
CRWD
$170.8Bcheck_circle
EGHT
$266.8M
ARR GrowthYoY
CRWD
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CRWD
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. trades at 34.2x EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.7x. On the Rule of 40, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. scores 51.6 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 10.3, placing CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 74% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.