analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q2 2026
Summary Verdict
CRWD: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
51.6CRWD
-44.1DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
Revenue Growth
23.7%CRWD
-14.5%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
Gross Margin
74%CRWD
35%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
FCF Margin
27.9%CRWD
-29.6%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
Operating Margin
-6.9%CRWD
-21.3%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
NRR
—CRWD
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CRWD
51.6check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CRWD
23.7%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CRWD
74%check_circle
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CRWD
27.9%check_circle
DDD
-29.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CRWD
-6.9%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CRWD
34.2x
DDD
1.2xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
CRWD
$170.8Bcheck_circle
DDD
$427.6M
ARR GrowthYoY
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. trades at 34.2x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at 1.2x. On the Rule of 40, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. scores 51.6 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 74% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.