analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CRWD: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
48.9CRWD
-37.4DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
Revenue Growth
21.7%CRWD
-12.1%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
Gross Margin
75%CRWD
34%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
FCF Margin
27.2%CRWD
-25.3%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
Operating Margin
-6.1%CRWD
-24.8%DDD
check_circleCRWD leads
NRR
—CRWD
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CRWD
48.9check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
CRWD
21.7%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CRWD
75%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CRWD
27.2%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CRWD
-6.1%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CRWD
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. scores 48.9 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 75% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.