Confluent, Inc. vs Verisk Analytics, Inc.
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
analyticsData & Analytics
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
CFLT: 2—VRSK: 3wins
Rule of 40
26.3CFLT
47.1VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
Revenue Growth
21.1%CFLT
6.8%VRSK
check_circleCFLT leads
Gross Margin
74%CFLT
70%VRSK
check_circleCFLT leads
FCF Margin
5.2%CFLT
40.4%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
Operating Margin
-32.6%CFLT
44.9%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
NRR
—CFLT
—VRSK
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CFLT
26.3
VRSK
47.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
CFLT
21.1%check_circle
VRSK
6.8%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CFLT
74%check_circle
VRSK
70%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CFLT
5.2%
VRSK
40.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
CFLT
-32.6%
VRSK
44.9%check_circle
NRRNet retention
CFLT
N/A
VRSK
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CFLT
10.1x
VRSK
9.7xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
CFLT
$11.1B
VRSK
$25.4Bcheck_circle
ARR GrowthYoY
CFLT
N/A
VRSK
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CFLT
N/A
VRSK
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Confluent, Inc. trades at 10.1x EV/Revenue versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. at 9.7x. On the Rule of 40, Confluent, Inc. scores 26.3 compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s 47.1, placing Verisk Analytics, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Confluent, Inc. 74% vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. 70%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Data & Analytics sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.