analyticsData & Analytics
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
CFLT: 2—VRSK: 3wins
Rule of 40
26.3CFLT
47.1VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
Revenue Growth
21.1%CFLT
6.8%VRSK
check_circleCFLT leads
Gross Margin
74%CFLT
70%VRSK
check_circleCFLT leads
FCF Margin
5.2%CFLT
40.4%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
Operating Margin
-32.6%CFLT
44.9%VRSK
check_circleVRSK leads
NRR
—CFLT
—VRSK
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CFLT
26.3
VRSK
47.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
CFLT
21.1%check_circle
VRSK
6.8%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CFLT
74%check_circle
VRSK
70%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CFLT
5.2%
VRSK
40.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
CFLT
-32.6%
VRSK
44.9%check_circle
NRRNet retention
CFLT
N/A
VRSK
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CFLT
10.1x
VRSK
N/A
Market CapUSD
CFLT
$11.1B
VRSK
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CFLT
N/A
VRSK
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CFLT
N/A
VRSK
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Confluent, Inc. trades at 10.1x EV/Revenue versus Verisk Analytics, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Confluent, Inc. scores 26.3 compared to Verisk Analytics, Inc.'s 47.1, placing Verisk Analytics, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Confluent, Inc. 74% vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. 70%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Data & Analytics sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.