analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CDNS: 5—EGHT: 0wins
Rule of 40
37.7CDNS
10.3EGHT
check_circleCDNS leads
Revenue Growth
14.9%CDNS
2.0%EGHT
check_circleCDNS leads
Gross Margin
99%CDNS
66%EGHT
check_circleCDNS leads
FCF Margin
22.8%CDNS
8.3%EGHT
check_circleCDNS leads
Operating Margin
27.4%CDNS
3.4%EGHT
check_circleCDNS leads
NRR
—CDNS
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CDNS
37.7check_circle
EGHT
10.3
Revenue GrowthYoY
CDNS
14.9%check_circle
EGHT
2.0%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CDNS
99%check_circle
EGHT
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CDNS
22.8%check_circle
EGHT
8.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CDNS
27.4%check_circle
EGHT
3.4%
NRRNet retention
CDNS
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CDNS
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Market CapUSD
CDNS
N/A
EGHT
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CDNS
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CDNS
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC scores 37.7 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 10.3, placing CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS INC 99% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.