Summary Verdict
CCLDO: 4—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
28.5CCLDO
-37.4DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
Revenue Growth
8.7%CCLDO
-12.1%DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
Gross Margin
—CCLDO
34%DDD
FCF Margin
19.7%CCLDO
-25.3%DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
Operating Margin
9.4%CCLDO
-24.8%DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
NRR
—CCLDO
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CCLDO
28.5check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
CCLDO
8.7%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CCLDO
19.7%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CCLDO
9.4%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, CareCloud, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CareCloud, Inc. scores 28.5 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing CareCloud, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.