Summary Verdict
CCLDO: 4—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
15.8CCLDO
-44.1DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
Revenue Growth
5.9%CCLDO
-14.5%DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
Gross Margin
—CCLDO
35%DDD
FCF Margin
9.9%CCLDO
-29.6%DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
Operating Margin
7.9%CCLDO
-21.3%DDD
check_circleCCLDO leads
NRR
—CCLDO
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CCLDO
15.8check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CCLDO
5.9%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CCLDO
9.9%check_circle
DDD
-29.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CCLDO
7.9%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CCLDO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, CareCloud, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CareCloud, Inc. scores 15.8 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing CareCloud, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.