Summary Verdict
CARS: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
20.9CARS
-37.4DDD
check_circleCARS leads
Revenue Growth
0.6%CARS
-12.1%DDD
check_circleCARS leads
Gross Margin
88%CARS
34%DDD
check_circleCARS leads
FCF Margin
20.4%CARS
-25.3%DDD
check_circleCARS leads
Operating Margin
8.3%CARS
-24.8%DDD
check_circleCARS leads
NRR
—CARS
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CARS
20.9check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
CARS
0.6%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CARS
88%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CARS
20.4%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
CARS
8.3%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
CARS
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CARS
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
CARS
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CARS
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CARS
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Cars.com Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Cars.com Inc. scores 20.9 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing Cars.com Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Cars.com Inc. 88% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.