analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 0—QLYS: 5wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
62.1QLYS
check_circleQLYS leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
10.2%QLYS
check_circleQLYS leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
83%QLYS
check_circleQLYS leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
51.9%QLYS
check_circleQLYS leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
33.5%QLYS
check_circleQLYS leads
NRR
—ALRM
—QLYS
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
QLYS
62.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
QLYS
10.2%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
QLYS
83%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
QLYS
51.9%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
QLYS
33.5%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
QLYS
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
QLYS
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
QLYS
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
QLYS
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
QLYS
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus QUALYS, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to QUALYS, INC.'s 62.1, placing QUALYS, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs QUALYS, INC. 83%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.