analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—LZ: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
30.0LZ
check_circleLZ leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
13.3%LZ
check_circleLZ leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
65%LZ
check_circleALRM leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
16.7%LZ
check_circleLZ leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
2.0%LZ
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—LZ
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
LZ
30.0check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
LZ
13.3%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%check_circle
LZ
65%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
LZ
16.7%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
LZ
2.0%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
LZ
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
LZ
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
LZ
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
LZ
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
LZ
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to LEGALZOOM.COM, INC.'s 30.0, placing LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs LEGALZOOM.COM, INC. 65%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.