analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—LIF: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
37.3LIF
check_circleLIF leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
31.0%LIF
check_circleLIF leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
78%LIF
check_circleLIF leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
6.3%LIF
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
0.4%LIF
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—LIF
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
LIF
37.3check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
LIF
31.0%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
LIF
78%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
LIF
6.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
LIF
0.4%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
LIF
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
LIF
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
LIF
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
LIF
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
LIF
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Life360, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Life360, Inc.'s 37.3, placing Life360, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Life360, Inc. 78%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.