analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 3—LAW: 2wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
-21.1LAW
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
8.8%LAW
check_circleLAW leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
75%LAW
check_circleLAW leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
-29.8%LAW
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
-31.1%LAW
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—LAW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
LAW
-21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
LAW
8.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
LAW
75%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
LAW
-29.8%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
LAW
-31.1%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
LAW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
LAW
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
LAW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
LAW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
LAW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus CS Disco, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to CS Disco, Inc.'s -21.1, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs CS Disco, Inc. 75%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.