Summary Verdict
ALRM: 1—FIG: 4wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
67.6FIG
check_circleFIG leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
44.9%FIG
check_circleFIG leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
82%FIG
check_circleFIG leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
22.7%FIG
check_circleFIG leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
-113.5%FIG
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—FIG
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
FIG
67.6check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
FIG
44.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
FIG
82%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
FIG
22.7%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
FIG
-113.5%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
FIG
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
FIG
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
FIG
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
FIG
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
FIG
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Figma, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Figma, Inc.'s 67.6, placing Figma, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Figma, Inc. 82%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.