analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 1—CVLT: 4wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
38.9CVLT
check_circleCVLT leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
18.9%CVLT
check_circleCVLT leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
81%CVLT
check_circleCVLT leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
20.0%CVLT
check_circleCVLT leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
6.3%CVLT
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—CVLT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
CVLT
38.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
CVLT
18.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
CVLT
81%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
CVLT
20.0%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
CVLT
6.3%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
CVLT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
CVLT
2.9x
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
CVLT
$4.3B
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
CVLT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
CVLT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC at 2.9x. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC's 38.9, placing COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC 81%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.