analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 4—CCLDO: 0wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
15.8CCLDO
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
5.9%CCLDO
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
—CCLDO
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
9.9%CCLDO
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
7.9%CCLDO
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—CCLDO
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
CCLDO
15.8
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%check_circle
CCLDO
5.9%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
CCLDO
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
CCLDO
9.9%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
CCLDO
7.9%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
CCLDO
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
CCLDO
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
CCLDO
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
CCLDO
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
CCLDO
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus CareCloud, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to CareCloud, Inc.'s 15.8, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.