ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q2 2026
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 3—RAMP: 2wins
Rule of 40
26.1ACIW
12.1RAMP
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
9.1%ACIW
10.1%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
Gross Margin
46%ACIW
71%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
FCF Margin
17.0%ACIW
2.0%RAMP
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
15.2%ACIW
10.8%RAMP
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—RAMP
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
26.1check_circle
RAMP
12.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
9.1%
RAMP
10.1%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
46%
RAMP
71%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.0%check_circle
RAMP
2.0%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
15.2%check_circle
RAMP
10.8%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.5x
RAMP
2.6xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.3Bcheck_circle
RAMP
$2.3B
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
RAMP
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.5x EV/Revenue versus LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. at 2.6x. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 26.1 compared to LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s 12.1, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 46% vs LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. 71%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.