ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs OOMA INC
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 3—OOMA: 2wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
17.8OOMA
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
9.5%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
150%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
8.3%OOMA
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
4.9%OOMA
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—OOMA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2check_circle
OOMA
17.8
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
OOMA
9.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
OOMA
150%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
OOMA
8.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
OOMA
4.9%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
OOMA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.8xcheck_circle
OOMA
5.1x
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.8Bcheck_circle
OOMA
$597.6M
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
OOMA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
OOMA
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.8x EV/Revenue versus OOMA INC at 5.1x. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to OOMA INC's 17.8, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs OOMA INC 150%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.