ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs OOMA INC
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 3—OOMA: 2wins
Rule of 40
26.1ACIW
17.8OOMA
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
9.1%ACIW
9.5%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
Gross Margin
46%ACIW
160%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
17.0%ACIW
8.3%OOMA
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
15.2%ACIW
8.5%OOMA
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—OOMA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
26.1check_circle
OOMA
17.8
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
9.1%
OOMA
9.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
46%
OOMA
160%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.0%check_circle
OOMA
8.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
15.2%check_circle
OOMA
8.5%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
OOMA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.5x
OOMA
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.3B
OOMA
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
OOMA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
OOMA
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.5x EV/Revenue versus OOMA INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 26.1 compared to OOMA INC's 17.8, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 46% vs OOMA INC 160%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.