ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs Intapp, Inc.
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q2 2026
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 3—INTA: 2wins
Rule of 40
26.1ACIW
18.9INTA
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
9.1%ACIW
10.0%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Gross Margin
46%ACIW
75%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
FCF Margin
17.0%ACIW
8.9%INTA
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
15.2%ACIW
-7.5%INTA
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—INTA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
26.1check_circle
INTA
18.9
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
9.1%
INTA
10.0%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
46%
INTA
75%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.0%check_circle
INTA
8.9%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
15.2%check_circle
INTA
-7.5%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.5xcheck_circle
INTA
5.4x
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.3Bcheck_circle
INTA
$2.9B
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.5x EV/Revenue versus Intapp, Inc. at 5.4x. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 26.1 compared to Intapp, Inc.'s 18.9, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 46% vs Intapp, Inc. 75%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.