ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs Intapp, Inc.
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 2—INTA: 3wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
37.7INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
28.8%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
75%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
8.9%INTA
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-7.5%INTA
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—INTA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2
INTA
37.7check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
INTA
28.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
INTA
75%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
INTA
8.9%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
INTA
-7.5%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.8xcheck_circle
INTA
4.7x
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.8Bcheck_circle
INTA
$2.5B
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.8x EV/Revenue versus Intapp, Inc. at 4.7x. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to Intapp, Inc.'s 37.7, placing Intapp, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs Intapp, Inc. 75%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.