Summary Verdict
ACIW: 2—INTA: 3wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
37.7INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
28.8%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
75%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
8.9%INTA
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-7.5%INTA
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—INTA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2
INTA
37.7check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
INTA
28.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
INTA
75%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
INTA
8.9%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
INTA
-7.5%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
INTA
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Intapp, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to Intapp, Inc.'s 37.7, placing Intapp, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs Intapp, Inc. 75%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.