Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightACIW vs INST

ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs Instructure Holdings, Inc.

Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison

analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

ACIW: 3INST: 2wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
-14.4INST
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
33.4%INST
check_circleINST leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
65%INST
check_circleINST leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
-47.8%INST
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-2.3%INST
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
ACIW
INST
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2check_circle
INST
-14.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
INST
33.4%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
INST
65%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
INST
-47.8%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
INST
-2.3%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
INST
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.8xcheck_circle
INST
5.9x
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.7Bcheck_circle
INST
$3.5B
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
INST
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
INST
N/A
insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.8x EV/Revenue versus Instructure Holdings, Inc. at 5.9x. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to Instructure Holdings, Inc.'s -14.4, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs Instructure Holdings, Inc. 65%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfilepersonInstructure Holdings, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons