ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. vs Gloo Holdings, Inc.
Side-by-Side SaaS Metrics & Valuation Comparison
analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 2—GLOO: 2wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
210.2GLOO
check_circleGLOO leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
298.5%GLOO
check_circleGLOO leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
—GLOO
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
-88.3%GLOO
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-86.7%GLOO
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—GLOO
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2
GLOO
210.2check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
GLOO
298.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
GLOO
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
GLOO
-88.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
GLOO
-86.7%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
GLOO
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
3.9x
GLOO
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
$5.9B
GLOO
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
GLOO
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
GLOO
N/A
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at 3.9x EV/Revenue versus Gloo Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to Gloo Holdings, Inc.'s 210.2, placing Gloo Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.