analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ACIW: 4—GDYN: 1wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
21.9GDYN
check_circleACIW leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
16.9%GDYN
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
35%GDYN
check_circleACIW leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
5.0%GDYN
check_circleACIW leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-1.5%GDYN
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—ACIW
—GDYN
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2check_circle
GDYN
21.9
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
GDYN
16.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%check_circle
GDYN
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%check_circle
GDYN
5.0%
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
GDYN
-1.5%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
GDYN
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
N/A
GDYN
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
N/A
GDYN
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
GDYN
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
GDYN
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC.'s 21.9, placing ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.