Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightACIW vs FIG
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

ACIW: 1FIG: 4wins
Rule of 40
24.2ACIW
67.6FIG
check_circleFIG leads
Revenue Growth
6.9%ACIW
44.9%FIG
check_circleFIG leads
Gross Margin
47%ACIW
82%FIG
check_circleFIG leads
FCF Margin
17.3%ACIW
22.7%FIG
check_circleFIG leads
Operating Margin
16.4%ACIW
-113.5%FIG
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
ACIW
FIG
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ACIW
24.2
FIG
67.6check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ACIW
6.9%
FIG
44.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ACIW
47%
FIG
82%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ACIW
17.3%
FIG
22.7%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ACIW
16.4%check_circle
FIG
-113.5%
NRRNet retention
ACIW
N/A
FIG
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ACIW
N/A
FIG
N/A
Market CapUSD
ACIW
N/A
FIG
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ACIW
N/A
FIG
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ACIW
N/A
FIG
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Figma, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. scores 24.2 compared to Figma, Inc.'s 67.6, placing Figma, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 47% vs Figma, Inc. 82%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personACI WORLDWIDE, INC. ProfilepersonFigma, Inc. ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons