analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—ZETA: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
38.5ZETA
check_circleZETA leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
29.9%ZETA
check_circleZETA leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
60%ZETA
check_circleZETA leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
8.6%ZETA
check_circleZETA leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-2.4%ZETA
check_circleZETA leads
NRR
—DDD
—ZETA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
ZETA
38.5check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
ZETA
29.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
ZETA
60%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
ZETA
8.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
ZETA
-2.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
ZETA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
ZETA
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
ZETA
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
ZETA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
ZETA
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Zeta Global Holdings Corp. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Zeta Global Holdings Corp.'s 38.5, placing Zeta Global Holdings Corp. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Zeta Global Holdings Corp. 60%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.