Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightALRM vs WK
analyticsVertical SaaS

Data as of Q1 2026

Summary Verdict

ALRM: 1WK: 4wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
33.5WK
check_circleWK leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
20.9%WK
check_circleWK leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
78%WK
check_circleWK leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
12.7%WK
check_circleWK leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
-3.9%WK
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
ALRM
WK
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
WK
33.5check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
WK
20.9%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
WK
78%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
WK
12.7%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
WK
-3.9%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
WK
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
WK
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
WK
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
WK
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
WK
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus WORKIVA INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to WORKIVA INC's 33.5, placing WORKIVA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs WORKIVA INC 78%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personAlarm.com Holdings, Inc. ProfilepersonWORKIVA INC ProfileVertical SaaSarrow_backAll Comparisons