Homechevron_rightComparechevron_rightWEAV vs ZM
analyticsCommunications

Data as of Q4 2023

Summary Verdict

WEAV: 2ZM: 3wins
Rule of 40
28.8WEAV
43.9ZM
check_circleZM leads
Revenue Growth
19.9%WEAV
4.4%ZM
check_circleWEAV leads
Gross Margin
101%WEAV
77%ZM
check_circleWEAV leads
FCF Margin
8.9%WEAV
39.5%ZM
check_circleZM leads
Operating Margin
-18.0%WEAV
23.1%ZM
check_circleZM leads
NRR
WEAV
ZM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
WEAV
28.8
ZM
43.9check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
WEAV
19.9%check_circle
ZM
4.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
WEAV
101%check_circle
ZM
77%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
WEAV
8.9%
ZM
39.5%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
WEAV
-18.0%
ZM
23.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
WEAV
N/A
ZM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
WEAV
N/A
ZM
N/A
Market CapUSD
WEAV
N/A
ZM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
WEAV
N/A
ZM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
WEAV
N/A
ZM
N/A

Advertisement

insights

Analysis

As of Q4 2023, Weave Communications, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Zoom Communications, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Weave Communications, Inc. scores 28.8 compared to Zoom Communications, Inc.'s 43.9, placing Zoom Communications, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Weave Communications, Inc. 101% vs Zoom Communications, Inc. 77%.

corporate_fare

Sector Context

Both companies operate in the Communications sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.

personWeave Communications, Inc. ProfilepersonZoom Communications, Inc. ProfileCommunicationsarrow_backAll Comparisons