analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
TENB: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
36.5TENB
-37.4DDD
check_circleTENB leads
Revenue Growth
11.0%TENB
-12.1%DDD
check_circleTENB leads
Gross Margin
78%TENB
34%DDD
check_circleTENB leads
FCF Margin
25.5%TENB
-25.3%DDD
check_circleTENB leads
Operating Margin
-0.9%TENB
-24.8%DDD
check_circleTENB leads
NRR
—TENB
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
TENB
36.5check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
TENB
11.0%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
TENB
78%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
TENB
25.5%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
TENB
-0.9%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
TENB
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
TENB
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
TENB
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
TENB
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
TENB
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Tenable Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Tenable Holdings, Inc. scores 36.5 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing Tenable Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Tenable Holdings, Inc. 78% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.