analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
DDD: 0—TENB: 5wins
Rule of 40
-44.1DDD
36.6TENB
check_circleTENB leads
Revenue Growth
-14.5%DDD
11.2%TENB
check_circleTENB leads
Gross Margin
35%DDD
78%TENB
check_circleTENB leads
FCF Margin
-29.6%DDD
25.4%TENB
check_circleTENB leads
Operating Margin
-21.3%DDD
-0.9%TENB
check_circleTENB leads
NRR
—DDD
—TENB
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
DDD
-44.1
TENB
36.6check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
DDD
-14.5%
TENB
11.2%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
DDD
35%
TENB
78%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
DDD
-29.6%
TENB
25.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
DDD
-21.3%
TENB
-0.9%check_circle
NRRNet retention
DDD
N/A
TENB
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
DDD
N/A
TENB
N/A
Market CapUSD
DDD
N/A
TENB
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
DDD
N/A
TENB
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
DDD
N/A
TENB
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, 3D SYSTEMS CORP trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Tenable Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, 3D SYSTEMS CORP scores -44.1 compared to Tenable Holdings, Inc.'s 36.6, placing Tenable Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35% vs Tenable Holdings, Inc. 78%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.