analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
RAMP: 5—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
40.2RAMP
-37.4DDD
check_circleRAMP leads
Revenue Growth
21.6%RAMP
-12.1%DDD
check_circleRAMP leads
Gross Margin
66%RAMP
34%DDD
check_circleRAMP leads
FCF Margin
18.6%RAMP
-25.3%DDD
check_circleRAMP leads
Operating Margin
0.7%RAMP
-24.8%DDD
check_circleRAMP leads
NRR
—RAMP
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
RAMP
40.2check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
RAMP
21.6%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
RAMP
66%check_circle
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
RAMP
18.6%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
RAMP
0.7%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
RAMP
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
RAMP
2.2x
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
RAMP
$1.8B
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
RAMP
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
RAMP
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. trades at 2.2x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. scores 40.2 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. 66% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.