analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 4—RAMP: 1wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
3.2RAMP
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
7.6%RAMP
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
71%RAMP
check_circleRAMP leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
-4.4%RAMP
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
10.3%RAMP
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—RAMP
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
RAMP
3.2
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%check_circle
RAMP
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
RAMP
71%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
RAMP
-4.4%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
RAMP
10.3%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
RAMP
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
RAMP
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
RAMP
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
RAMP
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
RAMP
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to LiveRamp Holdings, Inc.'s 3.2, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. 71%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.