analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
QTWO: 4—EGHT: 1wins
Rule of 40
38.6QTWO
8.5EGHT
check_circleQTWO leads
Revenue Growth
14.1%QTWO
0.1%EGHT
check_circleQTWO leads
Gross Margin
54%QTWO
67%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
FCF Margin
24.5%QTWO
8.4%EGHT
check_circleQTWO leads
Operating Margin
5.0%QTWO
2.1%EGHT
check_circleQTWO leads
NRR
—QTWO
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
QTWO
38.6check_circle
EGHT
8.5
Revenue GrowthYoY
QTWO
14.1%check_circle
EGHT
0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
QTWO
54%
EGHT
67%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
QTWO
24.5%check_circle
EGHT
8.4%
Operating MarginGAAP
QTWO
5.0%check_circle
EGHT
2.1%
NRRNet retention
QTWO
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
QTWO
N/A
EGHT
0.8x
Market CapUSD
QTWO
N/A
EGHT
$266.1M
ARR GrowthYoY
QTWO
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
QTWO
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Q2 Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.8x. On the Rule of 40, Q2 Holdings, Inc. scores 38.6 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 8.5, placing Q2 Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Q2 Holdings, Inc. 54% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 67%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.