Summary Verdict
ALRM: 3—OOMA: 2wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
17.8OOMA
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
9.5%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
150%OOMA
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
8.3%OOMA
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
4.9%OOMA
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—OOMA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
OOMA
17.8
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
OOMA
9.5%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
OOMA
150%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
OOMA
8.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
OOMA
4.9%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
OOMA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
OOMA
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
OOMA
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
OOMA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
OOMA
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus OOMA INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to OOMA INC's 17.8, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs OOMA INC 150%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.