analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q2 2018
Summary Verdict
OOMA: 4—ALRM: 1wins
Rule of 40
28.8OOMA
21.1ALRM
check_circleOOMA leads
Revenue Growth
9.5%OOMA
7.6%ALRM
check_circleOOMA leads
Gross Margin
146%OOMA
66%ALRM
check_circleOOMA leads
FCF Margin
19.3%OOMA
13.6%ALRM
check_circleOOMA leads
Operating Margin
3.7%OOMA
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—OOMA
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
OOMA
28.8check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
OOMA
9.5%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
OOMA
146%check_circle
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
OOMA
19.3%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
OOMA
3.7%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
OOMA
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
OOMA
4.1x
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
OOMA
$441.6M
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
OOMA
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
OOMA
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q2 2018, OOMA INC trades at 4.1x EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, OOMA INC scores 28.8 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing OOMA INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at OOMA INC 146% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.