analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
NABL: 4—ALRM: 1wins
Rule of 40
24.4NABL
21.1ALRM
check_circleNABL leads
Revenue Growth
9.7%NABL
7.6%ALRM
check_circleNABL leads
Gross Margin
77%NABL
66%ALRM
check_circleNABL leads
FCF Margin
14.7%NABL
13.6%ALRM
check_circleNABL leads
Operating Margin
7.2%NABL
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—NABL
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
NABL
24.4check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
NABL
9.7%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
NABL
77%check_circle
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
NABL
14.7%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
NABL
7.2%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
NABL
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
NABL
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
NABL
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
NABL
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
NABL
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, N-able, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, N-able, Inc. scores 24.4 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing N-able, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at N-able, Inc. 77% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.