analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 3—NABL: 2wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
18.2NABL
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
10.4%NABL
check_circleNABL leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
77%NABL
check_circleNABL leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
7.8%NABL
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
7.0%NABL
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—NABL
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
NABL
18.2
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
NABL
10.4%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
NABL
77%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
NABL
7.8%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
NABL
7.0%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
NABL
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
NABL
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
NABL
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
NABL
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
NABL
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus N-able, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to N-able, Inc.'s 18.2, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs N-able, Inc. 77%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.