Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—MQ: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
20.8MQ
check_circleMQ leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
22.0%MQ
check_circleMQ leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
70%MQ
check_circleMQ leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
-1.3%MQ
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
-5.8%MQ
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—MQ
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
MQ
20.8check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
MQ
22.0%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
MQ
70%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
MQ
-1.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
MQ
-5.8%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
MQ
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
MQ
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
MQ
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
MQ
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
MQ
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Marqeta, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Marqeta, Inc.'s 20.8, placing Marqeta, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Marqeta, Inc. 70%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.