analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 1—MANH: 4wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
29.1MANH
check_circleMANH leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
4.9%MANH
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
78%MANH
check_circleMANH leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
24.2%MANH
check_circleMANH leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
25.4%MANH
check_circleMANH leads
NRR
—ALRM
—MANH
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
MANH
29.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%check_circle
MANH
4.9%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
MANH
78%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
MANH
24.2%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%
MANH
25.4%check_circle
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
MANH
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
MANH
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
MANH
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
MANH
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
MANH
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC's 29.1, placing MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs MANHATTAN ASSOCIATES INC 78%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.