analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 2—INTA: 3wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
37.7INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
28.8%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
75%INTA
check_circleINTA leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
8.9%INTA
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
-7.5%INTA
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—INTA
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7
INTA
37.7check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%
INTA
28.8%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
INTA
75%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%check_circle
INTA
8.9%
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
INTA
-7.5%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
INTA
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
INTA
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
INTA
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
INTA
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
INTA
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Intapp, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Intapp, Inc.'s 37.7, placing Intapp, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Intapp, Inc. 75%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.