analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 3—INSE: 2wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
17.3INSE
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
-0.1%INSE
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
98%INSE
check_circleINSE leads
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
17.5%INSE
check_circleINSE leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
10.0%INSE
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—INSE
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
INSE
17.3
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%check_circle
INSE
-0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
INSE
98%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
INSE
17.5%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
INSE
10.0%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
INSE
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
INSE
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
INSE
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
INSE
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
INSE
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Inspired Entertainment, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to Inspired Entertainment, Inc.'s 17.3, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66% vs Inspired Entertainment, Inc. 98%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.