analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
INSE: 1—ALRM: 4wins
Rule of 40
7.7INSE
21.1ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
2.4%INSE
7.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
98%INSE
66%ALRM
check_circleINSE leads
FCF Margin
5.4%INSE
13.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
10.0%INSE
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—INSE
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
INSE
7.7
ALRM
21.1check_circle
Revenue GrowthYoY
INSE
2.4%
ALRM
7.6%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
INSE
98%check_circle
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
INSE
5.4%
ALRM
13.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
INSE
10.0%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
INSE
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
INSE
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
INSE
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
INSE
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
INSE
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Inspired Entertainment, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Inspired Entertainment, Inc. scores 7.7 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Inspired Entertainment, Inc. 98% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.