analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
IIIV: 3—EGHT: 2wins
Rule of 40
21.6IIIV
8.5EGHT
check_circleIIIV leads
Revenue Growth
19.9%IIIV
0.1%EGHT
check_circleIIIV leads
Gross Margin
145%IIIV
67%EGHT
check_circleIIIV leads
FCF Margin
1.6%IIIV
8.4%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
Operating Margin
1.6%IIIV
2.1%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
NRR
—IIIV
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
IIIV
21.6check_circle
EGHT
8.5
Revenue GrowthYoY
IIIV
19.9%check_circle
EGHT
0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
IIIV
145%check_circle
EGHT
67%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
IIIV
1.6%
EGHT
8.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
IIIV
1.6%
EGHT
2.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
IIIV
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
IIIV
1.7x
EGHT
0.8xcheck_circle
Market CapUSD
IIIV
$476.8Mcheck_circle
EGHT
$266.1M
ARR GrowthYoY
IIIV
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
IIIV
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, i3 Verticals, Inc. trades at 1.7x EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.8x. On the Rule of 40, i3 Verticals, Inc. scores 21.6 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 8.5, placing i3 Verticals, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at i3 Verticals, Inc. 145% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 67%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.