analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
GLOO: 2—DDD: 2wins
Rule of 40
221.4GLOO
-44.1DDD
check_circleGLOO leads
Revenue Growth
307.7%GLOO
-14.5%DDD
check_circleGLOO leads
Gross Margin
—GLOO
35%DDD
FCF Margin
-86.3%GLOO
-29.6%DDD
check_circleDDD leads
Operating Margin
-114.3%GLOO
-21.3%DDD
check_circleDDD leads
NRR
—GLOO
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GLOO
221.4check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
GLOO
307.7%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GLOO
N/A
DDD
35%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GLOO
-86.3%
DDD
-29.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GLOO
-114.3%
DDD
-21.3%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GLOO
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GLOO
1.0xcheck_circle
DDD
1.2x
Market CapUSD
GLOO
$119.6M
DDD
$427.6Mcheck_circle
ARR GrowthYoY
GLOO
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GLOO
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Gloo Holdings, Inc. trades at 1.0x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at 1.2x. On the Rule of 40, Gloo Holdings, Inc. scores 221.4 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing Gloo Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.