analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
GLOO: 2—ALRM: 2wins
Rule of 40
221.4GLOO
21.1ALRM
check_circleGLOO leads
Revenue Growth
307.7%GLOO
7.6%ALRM
check_circleGLOO leads
Gross Margin
—GLOO
66%ALRM
FCF Margin
-86.3%GLOO
13.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Operating Margin
-114.3%GLOO
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—GLOO
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GLOO
221.4check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
GLOO
307.7%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GLOO
N/A
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GLOO
-86.3%
ALRM
13.6%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GLOO
-114.3%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GLOO
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GLOO
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
GLOO
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GLOO
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GLOO
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Gloo Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Gloo Holdings, Inc. scores 221.4 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing Gloo Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.