analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
GDYN: 2—EGHT: 3wins
Rule of 40
23.6GDYN
8.5EGHT
check_circleGDYN leads
Revenue Growth
17.5%GDYN
0.1%EGHT
check_circleGDYN leads
Gross Margin
35%GDYN
67%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
FCF Margin
6.1%GDYN
8.4%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
Operating Margin
-0.5%GDYN
2.1%EGHT
check_circleEGHT leads
NRR
—GDYN
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDYN
23.6check_circle
EGHT
8.5
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDYN
17.5%check_circle
EGHT
0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDYN
35%
EGHT
67%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDYN
6.1%
EGHT
8.4%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
GDYN
-0.5%
EGHT
2.1%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GDYN
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDYN
N/A
EGHT
0.8x
Market CapUSD
GDYN
N/A
EGHT
$266.1M
ARR GrowthYoY
GDYN
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDYN
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.8x. On the Rule of 40, GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. scores 23.6 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 8.5, placing GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at GRID DYNAMICS HOLDINGS, INC. 35% vs 8X8 INC /DE/ 67%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.