analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
GDRX: 4—EGHT: 0wins
Rule of 40
21.2GDRX
8.5EGHT
check_circleGDRX leads
Revenue Growth
0.6%GDRX
0.1%EGHT
check_circleGDRX leads
Gross Margin
—GDRX
67%EGHT
FCF Margin
20.6%GDRX
8.4%EGHT
check_circleGDRX leads
Operating Margin
11.0%GDRX
2.1%EGHT
check_circleGDRX leads
NRR
—GDRX
—EGHT
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDRX
21.2check_circle
EGHT
8.5
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDRX
0.6%check_circle
EGHT
0.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDRX
N/A
EGHT
67%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDRX
20.6%check_circle
EGHT
8.4%
Operating MarginGAAP
GDRX
11.0%check_circle
EGHT
2.1%
NRRNet retention
GDRX
N/A
EGHT
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDRX
N/A
EGHT
0.8x
Market CapUSD
GDRX
N/A
EGHT
$266.1M
ARR GrowthYoY
GDRX
N/A
EGHT
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDRX
N/A
EGHT
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 8X8 INC /DE/ at 0.8x. On the Rule of 40, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. scores 21.2 compared to 8X8 INC /DE/'s 8.5, placing GoodRx Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.