Summary Verdict
GDRX: 4—DDD: 0wins
Rule of 40
21.2GDRX
-37.4DDD
check_circleGDRX leads
Revenue Growth
0.6%GDRX
-12.1%DDD
check_circleGDRX leads
Gross Margin
—GDRX
34%DDD
FCF Margin
20.6%GDRX
-25.3%DDD
check_circleGDRX leads
Operating Margin
11.0%GDRX
-24.8%DDD
check_circleGDRX leads
NRR
—GDRX
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDRX
21.2check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDRX
0.6%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDRX
N/A
DDD
34%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDRX
20.6%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
GDRX
11.0%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
GDRX
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDRX
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
GDRX
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GDRX
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDRX
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. scores 21.2 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing GoodRx Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.