analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
GDRX: 2—ALRM: 2wins
Rule of 40
21.2GDRX
21.1ALRM
check_circleGDRX leads
Revenue Growth
0.6%GDRX
7.6%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
—GDRX
66%ALRM
FCF Margin
20.6%GDRX
13.6%ALRM
check_circleGDRX leads
Operating Margin
11.0%GDRX
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—GDRX
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
GDRX
21.2check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
GDRX
0.6%
ALRM
7.6%check_circle
Gross Margin% of revenue
GDRX
N/A
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
GDRX
20.6%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
GDRX
11.0%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
GDRX
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
GDRX
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
GDRX
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
GDRX
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
GDRX
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, GoodRx Holdings, Inc. scores 21.2 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing GoodRx Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.