analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ALRM: 3—GDRX: 1wins
Rule of 40
18.7ALRM
12.3GDRX
check_circleALRM leads
Revenue Growth
8.0%ALRM
0.5%GDRX
check_circleALRM leads
Gross Margin
66%ALRM
—GDRX
FCF Margin
10.7%ALRM
11.8%GDRX
check_circleGDRX leads
Operating Margin
12.8%ALRM
9.9%GDRX
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—ALRM
—GDRX
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ALRM
18.7check_circle
GDRX
12.3
Revenue GrowthYoY
ALRM
8.0%check_circle
GDRX
0.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ALRM
66%
GDRX
N/A
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ALRM
10.7%
GDRX
11.8%check_circle
Operating MarginGAAP
ALRM
12.8%check_circle
GDRX
9.9%
NRRNet retention
ALRM
N/A
GDRX
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ALRM
N/A
GDRX
N/A
Market CapUSD
ALRM
N/A
GDRX
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ALRM
N/A
GDRX
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ALRM
N/A
GDRX
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus GoodRx Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. scores 18.7 compared to GoodRx Holdings, Inc.'s 12.3, placing Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.