analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
CVLT: 4—ALRM: 1wins
Rule of 40
53.1CVLT
21.1ALRM
check_circleCVLT leads
Revenue Growth
35.2%CVLT
7.6%ALRM
check_circleCVLT leads
Gross Margin
72%CVLT
66%ALRM
check_circleCVLT leads
FCF Margin
17.9%CVLT
13.6%ALRM
check_circleCVLT leads
Operating Margin
6.5%CVLT
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—CVLT
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CVLT
53.1check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
CVLT
35.2%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CVLT
72%check_circle
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CVLT
17.9%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CVLT
6.5%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
CVLT
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CVLT
3.4x
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
CVLT
$4.1B
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CVLT
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CVLT
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC trades at 3.4x EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC scores 53.1 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at COMMVAULT SYSTEMS INC 72% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.