analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
ADP: 4—DDD: 1wins
Rule of 40
33.4ADP
-37.4DDD
check_circleADP leads
Revenue Growth
10.1%ADP
-12.1%DDD
check_circleADP leads
Gross Margin
6%ADP
34%DDD
check_circleDDD leads
FCF Margin
23.4%ADP
-25.3%DDD
check_circleADP leads
Operating Margin
25.1%ADP
-24.8%DDD
check_circleADP leads
NRR
—ADP
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ADP
33.4check_circle
DDD
-37.4
Revenue GrowthYoY
ADP
10.1%check_circle
DDD
-12.1%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ADP
6%
DDD
34%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ADP
23.4%check_circle
DDD
-25.3%
Operating MarginGAAP
ADP
25.1%check_circle
DDD
-24.8%
NRRNet retention
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ADP
3.6x
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
ADP
$79.1B
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC trades at 3.6x EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC scores 33.4 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -37.4, placing AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC 6% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 34%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.