analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
ADP: 4—DDD: 1wins
Rule of 40
26.1ADP
-44.1DDD
check_circleADP leads
Revenue Growth
14.7%ADP
-14.5%DDD
check_circleADP leads
Gross Margin
6%ADP
35%DDD
check_circleDDD leads
FCF Margin
11.4%ADP
-29.6%DDD
check_circleADP leads
Operating Margin
27.7%ADP
-21.3%DDD
check_circleADP leads
NRR
—ADP
—DDD
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
ADP
26.1check_circle
DDD
-44.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
ADP
14.7%check_circle
DDD
-14.5%
Gross Margin% of revenue
ADP
6%
DDD
35%check_circle
FCF MarginFree cash flow
ADP
11.4%check_circle
DDD
-29.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
ADP
27.7%check_circle
DDD
-21.3%
NRRNet retention
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
Market CapUSD
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
ADP
N/A
DDD
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus 3D SYSTEMS CORP at N/A. On the Rule of 40, AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC scores 26.1 compared to 3D SYSTEMS CORP's -44.1, placing AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING INC 6% vs 3D SYSTEMS CORP 35%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.