analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q4 2025
Summary Verdict
FRSH: 4—ALRM: 1wins
Rule of 40
44.6FRSH
21.1ALRM
check_circleFRSH leads
Revenue Growth
16.4%FRSH
7.6%ALRM
check_circleFRSH leads
Gross Margin
85%FRSH
66%ALRM
check_circleFRSH leads
FCF Margin
28.2%FRSH
13.6%ALRM
check_circleFRSH leads
Operating Margin
1.6%FRSH
13.2%ALRM
check_circleALRM leads
NRR
—FRSH
—ALRM
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
FRSH
44.6check_circle
ALRM
21.1
Revenue GrowthYoY
FRSH
16.4%check_circle
ALRM
7.6%
Gross Margin% of revenue
FRSH
85%check_circle
ALRM
66%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
FRSH
28.2%check_circle
ALRM
13.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
FRSH
1.6%
ALRM
13.2%check_circle
NRRNet retention
FRSH
N/A
ALRM
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
FRSH
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Market CapUSD
FRSH
N/A
ALRM
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
FRSH
N/A
ALRM
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
FRSH
N/A
ALRM
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q4 2025, Freshworks Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, Freshworks Inc. scores 44.6 compared to Alarm.com Holdings, Inc.'s 21.1, placing Freshworks Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at Freshworks Inc. 85% vs Alarm.com Holdings, Inc. 66%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.