analyticsVertical SaaS
Data as of Q1 2026
Summary Verdict
CRWD: 4—ACIW: 1wins
Rule of 40
48.9CRWD
28.0ACIW
check_circleCRWD leads
Revenue Growth
21.7%CRWD
10.4%ACIW
check_circleCRWD leads
Gross Margin
75%CRWD
49%ACIW
check_circleCRWD leads
FCF Margin
27.2%CRWD
17.6%ACIW
check_circleCRWD leads
Operating Margin
-6.1%CRWD
18.8%ACIW
check_circleACIW leads
NRR
—CRWD
—ACIW
Metric
Rule of 40Efficiency score
CRWD
48.9check_circle
ACIW
28.0
Revenue GrowthYoY
CRWD
21.7%check_circle
ACIW
10.4%
Gross Margin% of revenue
CRWD
75%check_circle
ACIW
49%
FCF MarginFree cash flow
CRWD
27.2%check_circle
ACIW
17.6%
Operating MarginGAAP
CRWD
-6.1%
ACIW
18.8%check_circle
NRRNet retention
CRWD
N/A
ACIW
N/A
EV / RevenueValuation multiple
CRWD
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Market CapUSD
CRWD
N/A
ACIW
N/A
ARR GrowthYoY
CRWD
N/A
ACIW
N/A
CAC PaybackMonths to recover
CRWD
N/A
ACIW
N/A
Advertisement
insights
Analysis
As of Q1 2026, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. trades at N/A EV/Revenue versus ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. at N/A. On the Rule of 40, CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. scores 48.9 compared to ACI WORLDWIDE, INC.'s 28.0, placing CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. ahead in operating efficiency. Gross margins stand at CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. 75% vs ACI WORLDWIDE, INC. 49%.
Sector Context
Both companies operate in the Vertical SaaS sector. The median columns above show where each company stands relative to their peers.